The article states the opposing arguments
made on their stand and addresses them with facts and new research that has
been done. In this case the opposing arguments consists of teenagers being
known to be “reckless and impulsive”. There’s also the fact that teens are not
allowed to drink or smoke or have guns, so they shouldn’t be mature enough to
decide on complex issues. Well, the authors argue that new research shows that
young adolescents brain development is not directly correlated to irrational
behavior. Then they provide more statistics to push for the idea of American
adults being more violent than young teens.
Overall, they provide a well throughout
argument. They provide clear facts and statistics which appear to be credible.
They directly address the opposing views and counter them with the facts they
gathered. This essentially makes their argument more believable and more likely
to convince their audience, which in this case are adults and the elderly, to
change their minds on how they view teens, and perhaps allow them to vote.
I personally don’t agree with the
authors. I believe that the majority of teens are uneducated especially in the
U.S., thus making me hesitant about them voting. Perhaps instead of lowering
the age of voting, we should find ways to educate our young so they’re ready to
decide when their time comes.